Skip to main content

Who is responsible for Numeracy?

Is the Maths Learning Area (faculty, department, whatever you want to call it) at your school solely responsible for nurturing the numeracy capability in the Australian Curriculum? That would be like saying the English Learning Area is responsible for literacy. And Digital Technologies is responsible for Digital Literacy, Art is responsible for Critical and Creative Thinking, and Languages holds dominion over Intercultural Understanding. 

If I proposed this model of implementing the Australian Curriculum you would tell me I am mad. I hope.

I would like to open a conversation around the joint responsiblity Learning Areas have for developing numeracy in Australian students. It is hard to know where to start the conversation. As a starting point, how many staff in your school have accessed this page of the curriculum: "Understanding this General Capability", specifically numeracy, and are aware of the document available on this page outlining the progression of the Numeracy General Capability across the year levels?

High quality teachers certainly should have and should be using them in their planning. 

If you are a Maths teacher, how many times have you been asked, "When are we ever going to need this?" or "Why are we learning this?" If the answer is not a lot, then well done to you, your lessons are interesting and engaging enough that they are not even entering the students' minds. But if you have been asked this question, you are not alone, and you are not at fault. And I propose that you certainly are not solely responsible for answering the question.

I am sure that numeracy naturally enters many aspects of daily lesson time in many subject areas. For example, certainly HASS involves mapping and graphing, PE involves statistics and measurement and Art involves patterns and geometry, just for starters. 

But how much is numeracy a natural and deep part of learning and conversation in these subject areas? How confident are teachers in talking about numeracy and embedding it richly in their lessons and assessments? What are the attitudes of these teachers towards Mathematics and what language are they using in front of their students around mathematics and numeracy? I can only imagine that answers to these questions, based on my experiences but I would love to hear from teachers (and parents) thoughts around this.

I have a particular interest in cultural attitudes toward mathematics and numeracy and I plan to engage in some formal study on the subject in the future. These are my early musings and I would be very interested to hear from anyone who has thoughts or opinions on this. Please follow this blog and use the contact field to send me an email, or comment below.

EDIT: I have just come across this quote from Teacher Magazine:

"Numbers are everywhere. We now know that low numeracy affects job prospects more than low literacy (Parsons & Bynner, 2005) and that children with dyscalculia have difficulty managing money and are more at risk of school exclusion that non-dyscalculic children."

This strikes me like a bolt of lightning and should be sending waves of concern and attention across the education and wider community.



Comments

  1. I agree that it's a shared effort involving educators, parents, and policymakers. The call to integrate real-world applications into the curriculum is spot on. However, I believe fostering a positive attitude toward math is equally important. Let's empower students to see the relevance of numeracy in their daily lives. Thanks for this beneficial and informative article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment Rum Tan. A positive attitude towards math could be revolutionary in Australian society. I hope in my lifetime I see a paradigm shift in this area.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Musings on Rubrics (Feedback invited)

I am in need of widespread quality dialogue around the purpose and development of rubrics as we prepare for the implementation of Version 9 (V9) of the Australian Curriculum.  Once upon a time my school had a rubric that was similar to the SACE (South Australian Certificate of Education) performance standards. It was suggested that this was inappropriate as it did not indicate assessment of the Australian Curriculum Achievement Standards. We then moved to a rubric divided into the profiency strands of fluency, understanding, reasoning and problem-solving, and used qualifying language like 'consistently' and 'in un/familiar' situations. The relevant Achievement Standard sentence was attached to the rubric.  In planning for V9 we are redeveloping our rubric. It is proving to be a challenging thing to do as there is limited consensus among stakeholders as to what a middle school mathematics rubric in South Australia should look like. Some common discussion points are that ...

Making Measurement Meaningful and #ObserveMe

 I started the topic of "Measurement" with my Stage 2 Community Connections class today.  Last night I was pondering on how to teach my students about area and perimeter without boring them (and myself) to tears. I decided to follow this procedure: First step: Google your street address and locate your property on Google Maps. Mine looked like this: Second Step: Right click and select "Measure distance" and trace around your property. We noticed that Google gave us the total distance (perimeter) and area. My question for the students was, how did Google figure this out? Or in Stage 2 Community Connections language: "What are the dimensions of the block of land?"  and "What operation will we use to find a) the perimeter and b) the area?" I don't know about you but I find that many students (particularly at the lower ability levels) get confused about the difference between perimeter and area. They struggle to recognise that perimeter requires ...